We are concerned that: • academic workloads are already at breaking point. We are concerned about potential efforts to weaken existing workload protections, rather than strengthening them, through Enterprise Bargaining. The introduction of a Block Model has the potential to make a significant problem worse. • professional staff workloads will be negatively affected by the introduction of a Block Model. These concerns include a lack of information on how processes and systems for admissions, census dates and support cycles will be affected. This creates concern that professional staff will be required to accept unreasonable workloads, just to make a Block Model work. • there is not a plan to resource any change, despite clear feedback that significant resourcing will be required. Without it, staff will likely be left to pick up the slack on top of existing workloads.  • UC has a very recent history of financial issues stemming from throwing millions at a shiny new education initiative – this is a concerning path to go down again. • insufficient consideration has been given to what a Block Model means for academic integrity, especially in the age of AI. These concerns include that there may not be time to sufficiently address instances of suspected plagiarism or integrity issues, including through University processes, due of the relentless pressure to turn around marking quickly to reset for the next Block. • there has not been sufficient attention given to prerequisites, course design, and professional accreditation. Some disciplines face significant risks which have not been adequately explored. • a Block Model focuses extensively on teaching, without enough consideration of research. The potential for increases in teaching loads could compromise UC’s research, as well as research-informed teaching for students. • there has not been adequate consideration of placements or internships, and how they would work with a Block Model. • there would be impacts to staff resulting from any decision to embark on more University-wide change, following the job cuts of 2024 and 2025. Now is the time for stability, as constant change and uncertainty affects staff wellbeing. • the introduction of a Block Model would prioritise customer satisfaction over pedagogy and meaningful learning. There is concerning potential for a Block Model to affect course quality and outcomes. This could affect the reputation of UC’s degrees. • any attempt to limit a Block Model to postgraduate courses would likely cause more problems than it solves, as it fails to consider circumstances where undergraduate and postgraduate units are co-taught. Teaching staff may be required to work across multiple inconsistent teaching patterns. Professional staff who support the delivery of teaching would be severely impacted. Both academic and professional staff are concerned this could make effective workload planning impossible. • a Block Model means far greater disruption for staff or students due to illness or misadventure, as a short absence would mean missing more content than otherwise. This makes it difficult to catch up and increases pressure on people to come to campus while ill. • there isn’t a clear rationale for change. UC’s issues are not those of VU or SCU, and the University has conceded that it is not clear that a Block Model would recover costs through increased student load or retention. The potential benefits to the University have not been adequately articulated. The information provided to UC staff thus far has not addressed these concerns. While these genuine and reasonable concerns remain unaddressed, and in the absence of a compelling case backed by adequate and significant resourcing to facilitate the transition, we believe a Block Model should not be introduced at the University of Canberra. 

Long-serving DXC workers are fighting for equal treatment by our employer. Despite our loyalty and dedication, we're being denied the same redundancy entitlements, even though we all face the same risks of organisational restructure.  This isn’t about perks, it’s about job security and fairness. The current offer divides the workforce, rewarding some while disadvantaging others who’ve contributed just as much. We're demanding equal rights, dignity, and respect.

The Clinical Trials Unit plays a critical role in advancing medical research, improving patient outcomes, and providing Tasmanians with access to cutting-edge treatments that may otherwise be unavailable. It supports innovation, attracts skilled professionals, and contributes to the broader health system through evidence-based care. Despite its importance, the Unit is currently under pressure due to workload challenges, staffing shortages, and uncertainty around future funding. Without adequate support, the Unit risks being unable to meet demand, compromising both patient care and research capacity. The Time to Act is Now Investing in clinical trials is an investment in the future of healthcare. It ensures Tasmanians benefit from the latest medical advancements and that our health system remains at the forefront of research and treatment. We stand in solidarity with the staff and patients who rely on this vital service.

This is about protecting the people who care for our communities — the workers who support those experiencing homelessness, family violence, mental health challenges, disability, and social isolation. These roles are often invisible, yet absolutely essential. If their pay and conditions are cut, it sends a clear message that this work - and the people they support - don’t matter. These workers hold our communities together, often under immense pressure and with little recognition. When they’re undervalued or forced out of the sector, it’s the public who suffers — through reduced services, higher burnout, and weakened care systems. This isn’t just a workers’ issue — it’s a community issue.

This case lays bare a systemic issue in Victoria’s hospitality industry: employers thinking they can ignore the law and get away with wage theft. Celeste and Connor did everything right. They stood up, took their case to court and won. But court decisions alone aren’t enough if bosses can just walk away without consequences. We need public accountability. Employers must understand that wage theft is illegal, and the community is watching. Until justice is served, we won’t back down. ✊

We work to understand, influence and transform systems to achieve sustainable development in Australia and our region. We do this by collaborating with government, industry, academic and civil society partners, and establish transdisciplinary teams to identify pathways and innovative solutions to help the world achieve the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Our partnership approach has seen us win awards for our impact focus. MSDI aims to achieve sustainable development in Australia and our region by understanding, influencing and transforming the systems that are embedded in our society.

Following the 2021 coup, the military junta plans to stage sham elections on December 28, 2025. This is not democracy; it is an attempt to rebrand a violent dictatorship and entrench its power. By escalating sanctions and recognising Myanmar’s democratic forces, Australia can help cut the junta’s financial lifelines and stand with the people of Myanmar in their struggle for democracy.

The Health Minister has suggested that patients can go elsewhere in the public system but we know this simply isn’t true. The Hobart Clinic is the only service in the state offering vital treatments such as inpatient TMS. Without it, patients would need to be much sicker before they could be admitted through the emergency department. Wait times will grow even further, already stretched public services will be pushed beyond breaking point, and lives will be placed in real danger. The Hobart Clinic plays a crucial role in keeping people well and out of the public system. Most patients are lower acuity and would never qualify for crisis-based hospital services. What are they meant to do when there is nothing else like this available anywhere in Tasmania? Some will have to consider travelling interstate to access the same kind of treatment – an option most simply cannot afford. Staff have been treated terribly throughout this entire process. They found out about the closure only an hour before the news was released to the public. These are dedicated professionals who pour their hearts into delivering some of the best mental health care in the country but they've been treated with nothing but contempt. The Hobart Clinic, as a registered charity, exists to serve the community, not to generate a profit. Not that long ago, the Hobart Clinic was even discussing expansion – so how has it come to this? Why should patients and staff bear the burden of years of financial mismanagement?

The NT Government’s failure to act means dangerously understaffed pharmacy departments are left to cope under impossible conditions. Pharmacists and technicians are exhausted, patients face delays and reduced services, and communities risk losing access to essential healthcare. Every message, every call, and every signature sends a strong signal: pharmacists across Australia will not accept unsafe staffing and government neglect. Together, we can protect patients and support our profession. In solidarity, Professionals Australia

This short-sighted decision will create an avoidable shortage of nurses and midwives in the future, a strain on the current nursing and midwifery workforce and increased pressure on the public and private healthcare systems. To provide the healthcare services the Victorian community needs we must keep building our new and early career workforce as well as retaining our experienced nurses and midwives. We must ensure today’s students are tomorrow’s workforce. Use us or lose us. It doesn’t have to be this way – we call on the Victorian Government to employ all of our 2026 graduate nurses and midwives. 

Across the world, including in Gaza, Sudan, Ukraine, and other war-torn regions, healthcare facilities are being deliberately targeted, Nurses, midwives, doctors and aid workers risk their lives daily to deliver lifesaving care, yet they are being bombed, abducted, or killed simply for doing their jobs. These attacks violate international humanitarian law, including the Geneva Conventions, which clearly mandate the protection of civilians, medical staff, the wounded and sick, and humanitarian workers in times of war.  Nurses and midwives in Australia stand in solidarity with our colleagues on the frontlines. We cannot remain silent while the principles of neutrality and humanity, the very foundations of healthcare, are being shredded. 

In support of our petition, we observe that:  • ANU Council has the entire control and management of the University and is required to act in all matters concerning the ANU in the way it thinks will best promote the interests of the ANU;  • Staff, students and members of the community have reasonable and genuinely held concerns about the direction of our national university. Many of these concerns relate to the delivery of Renew ANU, which has been destructive and harmful to staff, students and the capacity of the University to perform its functions; and  • A range of issues relating to transparency, accountability, governance and leadership at the ANU have been widely reported, and have not been adequately addressed. These are a source of ongoing damage to the reputation and standing of our national university, which is now subject to an unprecedented investigation by TEQSA.  For these reasons we conclude it is reasonable, necessary and in the best interests of the ANU for ANU Council to fulfil its duties by immediately adopting the course of action proposed by this petition.